Dear Deeply Readers,

Welcome to the archives of Syria Deeply. While we paused regular publication of the site on May 15, 2018, and transitioned some of our coverage to Peacebuilding Deeply, we are happy to serve as an ongoing public resource on the Syrian conflict. We hope you’ll enjoy the reporting and analysis that was produced by our dedicated community of editors contributors.

We continue to produce events and special projects while we explore where the on-site journalism goes next. If you’d like to reach us with feedback or ideas for collaboration you can do so at [email protected].

BROWSE THE SYRIA DEEPLY ARCHIVES

What Challenges Remain in Removing Chemical Weapons from Syria?

After the OPCW announces that half of Assad’s chemical weapons cache has been removed from the country via the post of Latakia, we check in on the challenges facing the rest – including the potential easing of Russia’s crucial pressure on the Syrian government.

Written by Karen Leigh Published on Read time Approx. 3 minutes

On Thursday, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), which is overseeing the removal of Syria’s chemical weapons cache, said that more than half of the country’s arsenal had been removed via the port of Latakia. Thus far, 11 batches have been shipped, including all of its mustard gas. Though behind schedule, the OPCW said it hopes to remove or destroy the remainder of the weapons by June 30.

We asked Hamish de Bretton Gordon OBE, a chemical weapons expert focusing on the Syrian crisis and founder of London-based SecureBio, to weigh in on the causes of the delay and the challenges facing the OPCW and the Syrian government between now and June.

Syria Deeply: What’s happened in the last week, and what are the major challenges facing the chemical weapons overseers at this time?

Hamish de Bretton Gordon: The [mustard gas] has all now left Latakia. In effect what we have are toxic chemicals that are used to mix to make chemical agents like nerve agents, like sarin.

There are two issues at the moment. The first is whether the Russians are going to withdraw any of their support and not pressure Assad to remove the chemicals, and without that support, nothing further is going to happen. The Russians are the ones forcing the government to move the chemical weapons to Latakia.

The Russian foreign ministry last week said that the Syrian chemical weapons program’s mixing facilities had been destroyed. Thirty tons of mustard gas were removed in February, and what’s left is 600 tons of toxic chemicals. The aim of the chemical weapons removal was to prevent them from being used again, and I think that’s been achieved.

SD: What are the latest developments?

De Bretton Gordon: Over the weekend, OPCW confirmed that there are two sites that they and the Syrian government cannot get to because they are being blocked by the opposition. They’ve been blocked for some months. I don’t see that changing any time soon. I know ISIS is certainly involved, and certainly around Latakia.

SD: How much is left in Syria?

De Bretton Gordon: With the dangerous stuff out, we have an 80 percent solution. The mechanisms to make chemical weapons have been destroyed. So now to try and eke out that last 20 percent, which is 20,000 tons of toxic chemicals, is going to drag on for many months and many civilians could die as the government tries to move these remaining chemicals to the coast. And it keeps the international focus on chemical weapons, rather than what else is going on every day.

SD: Has the mission – removing tons of weapons and transporting them from Damascus to Latakia – been as dangerous as anticipated?

De Bretton Gordon: There’s been six convoys thus far. To my knowledge, every single one has been attacked [by the opposition]. The Syrian government has put massive military resources into these convoys, supporting them with tanks and air protection. They also put forces down the road before the convoys, almost blasting through to Latakia. We’re three or four months behind schedule now on removal, and I think it’s because the government doesn’t want to put so much military effort into it because it’s affecting their other operations.

It’s a really intense time at the moment. Every convoy thus far has been attacked and there were five rockets fired at Latakia during loading, so there’s been pretty intense fighting in and around the convoys.

SD: With its resources stretched, might the government be dragging its feet on removing the rest?

De Bretton Gordon: They can’t fight the opposition when they have these chemicals to support. Latakia has been attacked by rockets a number of times, and five landed close to where they were loading [the chemicals onto a ship] last week. The opposition in various guises has been attacking the convoy, and it’s taken a massive effort by the Syrian army to get everything through from Damascus to the coast by using overwhelming force. Without the Russians leaning on them, which could continue to be the case going forward as Crimea [unfolds], the government will become more reluctant.

SD: What are the issues facing the team going forward?

De Bretton Gordon: There are two issues at stake: there is a view that the government has not declared its stockpile in its entirety. Another is proliferation, which is that stockpile falling into the hands of al-Qaida and ISIS, and there’s also the threat that small amounts of Syria’s stockpiles have moved into neighboring countries like Iraq.

Republish this article

Our mission is to empower stakeholders and the wider public with high quality information, insights, and analysis on critical global issues. To help achieve this, we encourage you to republish the text of any article that contains a Republish button on your own news outlet.

By copying the HTML below, you agree to adhere to our republishing guidelines.

By copying the HTML below, you agree to adhere to our republishing guidelines. Click to expand

  1. In republishing any of our articles:

    Ensure that you include a line of our HTML tracking code on every article you republish. This is a lightweight, efficient way for us to see the number of page views of each specific article published on our partners’ websites. This does not affect page layout, nor does it provide any information about your users, other web pages on your site, or any further data. By copying and pasting the HTML code in the box below, the tracking code is automatically included.

    If, for any reason, you do not copy the code prepared for you, you must paste this code snippet into the end of the article in your CMS: 

    <img src="http://ping.newsdeeply.com/pixel.gif?key=99017&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsdeeply.com%2Fsyria%2Farticles%2F2014%2F03%2F24%2Fwhat-challenges-remain-in-removing-chemical-weapons-from-syria" alt="" />

  2. Adhere to the guidelines below:
    • Edit our stories only to reflect references to time (e.g. "today" to "yesterday"), location (e.g. "New York" to "here") or editorial style; do not edit the wording of our articles.
    • Include all the links within the story.
    • Credit our authors and partner institutions — ideally in the byline. We prefer “Author Name, Institution”
    • Note at the top and/or bottom of the story that it originally appeared on Syria Deeply. This note should include a direct link to the original article and a sentence that offers the reader the opportunity to join the Syria’s mailing list. Our recommended example is:
      • This should read : “This article originally appeared on Syria Deeply. You can find the original here. For important news about the war in Syria, you can sign up to the Syria email list.”
    • Do not republish a photo without our written permission. Some sources don't allow their images to be republished without permission.
    • Do not translate a story into another language without our written permission.
    • We often republish pieces from our partners. If you want to republish a partner’s story, you must credit the original partner and include a “via News Deeply” link.
    • Note that News Deeply considers the publication date to be the date marked on the story, and is not responsible for any content that you choose to repost.
    • After republication on the partner website, if you make an accompanying post on social media referencing the republished article, you must include the relevant Deeply social media handle in such post. For example, (i) for Twitter posts this means adding the appropriate @Deeply tag such as @SyriaDeeply, @WaterDeeply, or @WomensGirlsHub and (ii) for Facebook this means tagging the appropriate Deeply page in your Facebook post.
    • News Deeply material may not to be provided, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, to third parties or affiliates for redistribution through those entities, unless you have received prior written approval from News Deeply.
    • You may not automatically or systematically republish any material from our sites; all stories must be chosen individually for republishing.
    • You may not sell our content or republish it for commercial purposes without our prior written consent.
    • We reserve the right to request that any partner ceases republication of our content, including but not limited to if the guidelines listed above not being followed.
    • If you have any questions or concerns please contact [email protected]

Suggest your story or issue.

Send

Share Your Story.

Have a story idea? Interested in adding your voice to our growing community?

Learn more