Dear Deeply Readers,

Welcome to the archives of Refugees Deeply. While we paused regular publication of the site on April 1, 2019, we are happy to serve as an ongoing public resource on refugees and migration. We hope you’ll enjoy the reporting and analysis that was produced by our dedicated community of editors and contributors.

We continue to produce events and special projects while we explore where the on-site journalism goes next. If you’d like to reach us with feedback or ideas for collaboration you can do so at [email protected].

Executive Summary for March 14th

We review key refugee issues, including a hunger strike in a Hungarian detention center, the state of Tennessee suing the U.S. government over its federal resettlement program and reports of the U.K. returning asylum seekers to countries where they face threats.

Published on March 14, 2017 Read time Approx. 3 minutes

Asylum Seekers in Hungarian Detention Start Hunger Strike

Migrants and asylum seekers in a Hungarian detention center went on a hunger strike starting Monday, Hungary’s immigration and asylum office told Reuters.

At least 94 of the 102 inmates in the Bekescsaba camp near the Romanian border began the strike to protest their detention and the appalling conditions inside the closed facility.

“Most of the hunger strikers are under Dublin proceedings as they unlawfully left the country of first entry into the European Union,” Hungarian authorities explained to Reuters in an emailed statement.

“They complained about being fingerprinted as they have no intention to stay in Hungary,” the email statement to Reuters added.

In a letter addressed to the Hungarian immigration authorities, the migrants sought permission to leave the country.

State of Tennessee vs. Federal Government Over Resettlement

The state of Tennessee filed a lawsuit against the U.S. federal government over its refugee resettlement program on the basis of the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, according to the Tennessean.

Tennessee is the first state to implement the amendment.

The lawsuit was launched on the basis of the “unconstitutionality” of the Federal Refugee Resettlement Program that purportedly violates states’ rights.

According to the state of Tennessee, which withdrew from the federal refugee resettlement program in 2007, the federal government continued to resettle refugees by authorizing local faith-based groups to administer the resettlement while asking the state to pay for it.

Therefore, the lawsuit claims that the federal government is not abiding by the Refugee Act of 1980 that is tied to the 10th Amendment. According to the 10th Amendment, the federal government is only vested with powers defined by the Constitution, while the states have authority over all other decisions.

“Operation of the federal refugee resettlement program commandeers Tennessee’s funds through Medicaid with the threatened loss of nearly $7 billion, amounting to 20 percent of its overall state budget – money that is needed to fund services that are critical to the health and welfare of countless Tennesseans,” the lawsuit said.

Hedy Weinberg, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee, denounced the lawsuit in a statement, expressing concerns over the “not only very troubling, but unjust and wrong move against Muslim refugees.”

U.K. Returns Asylum Seekers to Countries Where They Face Abuse

Using the Dublin regulations, the U.K. is returning asylum seekers to eastern European states where they face “police brutality, detention and beatings,” migrants rights groups informed the Guardian.

The Home Office is returning people to other E.U. countries under the Dublin rules that require asylum seekers to apply in the first port of entry.

Migrants’ rights groups say that the assumption that asylum seekers will be treated in a humane manner by all E.U. countries is not grounded in reality, given the conditions in the Balkan member states.

Asylum seekers are beaten by border guards in Bulgaria, locked in “cages” in Hungary and “waterboarded” in Romania, according to some of the testimonies presented by rights groups in the U.K. and the Balkans.

“These are people who were abused in their home country, sometimes jailed by the regime there. Then they were imprisoned again in Europe. They feel that they are still living in a war zone, moving from one arrest and detention to another,” said Nazek Ramadan, the director of Migrant Voice.

Recommended Reads:

Suggest your story or issue.

Send

Share Your Story.

Have a story idea? Interested in adding your voice to our growing community?

Learn more
× Dismiss
We have updated our Privacy Policy with a few important changes specific to General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) and our use of cookies. If you continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies. Read our full Privacy Policy here.