× Dismiss

Never Miss an Update.

Arctic Deeply is designed to help you understand the complex web of environmental, social and economic issues in the High North. Our editors and expert contributors are working around the clock to bring you greater clarity and comprehensive coverage of Arctic issues.

Sign up to our newsletter to receive our weekly updates, special reports, and featured insights on one of the most pressing issues of our time.

  • Articles
  • General

Alaska: Layoffs, Deficit and an Uncertain Future

HIGH NORTH NEWS: Depressed petroleum markets are not just lowering prices at the pump, they are redefining the fabric of Alaska’s once stable economy. A new study predicts the current $3.8 billion deficit could mean up to 30,000 direct and indirect job losses across the state.

Written by Victoria Herrmann Published on Read time Approx. 5 minutes
Alaska budget legislature 56f2c0e5749a0

Thirty years ago, the Alaskan economy saw nearly one in every ten jobs disappear. In what has come to be known as the State Spending Recession, the extraordinary growth of state capital spending resulted in the loss of 1,660 jobs per month at its peak. Alaska saw 14 banks close in the span of three years and a population loss of 10 percent from 1985 to 1988.

Exacerbated by the housing and heavy construction bubble the state created, memories of the 1980s recession still elicit a very visceral anxiety from Alaskans today.

And according to a new study published by the University of Alaska’s Institute for Social and Economic Research this month, that anxiety is not unwarranted.

The study, titled Economic Impacts of Alaska Fiscal Options and led by Gunnar Knapp, director of the institute, shows that Alaska’s economy will crash on a similar scale to that of the 1980s recession, with the potential for a long-term economic depression. The report considers the economic impact of future changes to state spending and taxation.

Examining different options, the research presents the percentage of Alaska’s job losses from state budget cuts, taxes and the reduction of the Alaska Permanent Fund dividends. It details potential policy options for the legislature to consider, and which government workers would be most affected by each option. Each varies in terms of who is most affected and the relative magnitude of impacts. Overall, Knapp recommends spreading cuts and tax increases over two years to reduce any consequential shocks.

While the research itself does not advocate for or against any option, the report concludes that closing the current $3.8 billion deficit would cost up to 30,000 jobs in direct and indirect losses.

A lack of “significant progress this year” by the legislature to close the deficit could result in even more jobs lost in the years to come.

Significant progress means:

  1. major reduction in the deficit;
  2. consensus on a plan for what else we will do and when we will do it; and
  3. showing that we can and will achieve sustainable, stable and predictable state spending revenues.

The state of Alaska has already made heavy cuts in spending that will hit the economy in full in 2017. Using the metrics of the new report, these billions of dollars in reduced capital spending by the government alone will cost 9,000 jobs.

A Lack of Legislative Action

Knapp’s study was commissioned by Governor Bill Walker’s administration for $60,000 to better understand the government’s options.

Earlier in 2015, Governor Walker proposed a plan to fix the deficit with income tax and permanent fund restructuring. And while the governor has played a major role in addressing Alaska’s current economic downturn, his legislature has not yet engaged in finding a meaningful policy and budget resolution.

Many Alaskans have criticized the state legislature in Juneau for doing nothing thus far to address the issue. Ron Duncan, president and CEO of the telecommunications corporation GCI, fears an “uncontained failure” if no legislative plan is created. Alaska Dispatch columnist Charles Wohlforth has gone so far as to call for a dismissal of “legislative leaders who waited until the brink of the precipice to start asking serious questions.”

The Alaska Senate is set to pass a version of the state-operating budget this week to support the House’s own plan, which was passed last week. While the budget will include parts of addressing the recession, Governor Walker has stressed the need for a more comprehensive, long-term fiscal plan to address the multibillion-dollar deficit.

The Layoffs Beyond Government

The new report by Knapp focuses only on the portion of the economy that is driven by government and does not cover that which is driven by the private sector. Consequently, it does not taken into consideration job losses in other basic industries that have driven the Alaskan economy for decades. While absent from the report, such job losses have been felt across the state throughout 2015.

The oil industry, which once accounted for one third of all Alaskan jobs, lost about 9 percent of its employees last year. Earlier this month, BP announced that workers can expect another 4 percent of Alaskan employee and agency layoffs in the month to come, resulting in about 84 job losses. This follows a BP announcement in January that it would reduce its Alaska workforce by 13 percent, cutting 270 jobs.

These issues are only going to get worse in the years to come with the continued trend of low oil prices. Mineral and fish prices are also down, and the strength of the American dollar has been identified as a potential obstacle for tourism growth. Even the U.S. Department of Defense is considering force reductions to protect its northernmost state. Such job losses could expand to skilled worker layoff and decreased service investment if businesspeople lose confidence in Alaska’s ability to balance its deficit. As noted by Duncan, he and other business leaders like him will halt investment, cancel plans, lay off workers and send money outside the state.

The Deepest Recession

When pressed to look hard at the unavoidable recession looming over their state, Alaskans remember the suffering of the 1980s. But there is a major difference between today’s deficit and yesterday’s economic downturn. In 1985, excessive state spending created a real estate and construction bubble that popped. Today’s Alaska does not have a bubble. And it does not have a single victim industry.

The crash that began last year will hit Alaska slower, but it’s poised to do more damage. The new report and the labor statistics of Alaska show that it will hit many industries, affect many families and fundamentally redefine the way Alaskans earn a living. Knapp has said that Alaska has “lost billions of dollars that aren’t coming back. We just have to adjust.”

Alaska is the first northern government to face a quicker-than-expected transition to a less oil-dependent economy. But it will not be the last. Local governments across the Arctic region will be keeping a watchful eye on Alaska this week as the Alaskan legislature reads Knapp’s report and plans for an uncertain future.

This story was originally published in High North News and is reproduced here with permission.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Arctic Deeply.

Top image: A steep drop in oil revenues has left Alaska lawmakers, including Senate Finance Committee co-chairs Anna MacKinnon and Pete Kelly, to figure out how to pay the bills. (AP Photo/Becky Bohrer)

Become a Contributor.

Have a story idea? Interested in adding your voice to our growing community?

Learn more